Password Hash Generator & Verifier Password hash generation and verification tools
Quickly generate and verify password hashes such as bcrypt, Argon2id, PBKDF2, etc. Supports Salt automatic generation, Cost setting, performance benchmark testing and algorithm comparison. Built for developers and security learners.
Password input
algorithm
bcrypt
Recommended
Argon2id
Most recommended
PBKDF2
Available
SHA-256
⚠️ Education
Length: 0 bytes
Verify
produce results
Benchmark — browser performance
⚠️ Browser performance test, the actual server speed will be faster (about 5-20x)
Algorithm comparison
| algorithm | security | speed | Suggestions |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHA-256 | ⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ❌ It is not recommended to save passwords |
| PBKDF2 | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ | ⚠️Available (high iteration recommended) |
| bcrypt | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐ | ✅ Recommended |
| Argon2id | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐ | 🏆 Most recommended |
Security ratings take into account brute force resistance, ASIC/GPU resistance, and design maturity.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
How is a Password Hash different from a normal Hash?
• Deliberately slow: Control the calculation time through Cost Factor and increase the cost of brute force cracking
• Automatically add Salt: Use a different Salt for each password to prevent rainbow table attacks
• GPU/ASIC resistant: Argon2id requires a lot of memory, making parallel acceleration difficult for GPUs
Conclusion:Never use MD5 or SHA-256 to store passwords directly, please use bcrypt, Argon2id, or PBKDF2.
Why do you need Salt?
• Anti-rainbow watch: Pre-calculated Hash comparison table (rainbow table) cannot be used because each Salt is different
• Anti-duplication: Even if two users set the same password, the hash generated will be different.
• Increase cracking costs: The attacker needs to perform brute force cracking on each Salt separately, which cannot be processed in batches.
The standard practice is to use a different random Salt for each password (at least 16 bytes) and store the Salt together with the Hash (the output of bcrypt already contains the Salt).
How to choose between bcrypt, Argon2id and PBKDF2?
• bcrypt(Large recommendation base): Designed in 1999, mature and stable, widely supported. Built-in Salt and Cost controls are the default choice for many frameworks.
• PBKDF2(Available): FIPS certified standard, strength controlled by number of iterations. Weak to GPU/ASIC, requires extremely high number of iterations (hundreds of thousands).
• SHA-256(Educational use only): Not recommended for password storage, no Salt, too fast, and easily vulnerable to GPU brute force cracking.
Suggestions:New projects use Argon2id and existing projects maintain bcrypt, both of which are far superior to PBKDF2.
What is Cost Factor?
• Cost 8 — Faster, affordable for low-end hardware (~50ms)
• Cost 10 - generally recommended value, balancing security and performance (about 200ms)
• Cost 12 — Safer, suitable for scenarios with high security requirements (about 800ms)
• Cost 14 — Very safe, but user experience may be affected (about 3s)
It is recommended to adjust the Cost according to the server performance to maintain each verification time at 200-500ms. As hardware advances, the Cost value should be gradually increased.
Why not just use SHA-256 to store passwords?
• too fast: GPU can calculate SHA-256 billions of times per second, brute force cracking is only a matter of time
• No Salt: The same password generates the same hash, and the rainbow table attack is effective
• Zero GPU-resistant design: No memory required, GPU can perform massive parallel computing
Even with Salt and multiple iterations (as PBKDF2 does), the underlying design of SHA-256 is still less suitable as a cryptographic hash algorithm than bcrypt or Argon2id.
The simplest way to remember:Hash is used for files, Password Hash is used for passwords.
Can the password be restored after hashing?
When verifying a password, the system recalculates the hash of the password entered by the user, and then compares it with the hash stored in the database to see if it is the same. This is how the "verify" feature of this tool works.
Any service claiming to be able to "decrypt" or "restore" password hashes is a scam.- They just use rainbow tables or dictionaries of common passwords for comparison.
The complete guide to password hashing
Why can't passwords be stored in clear text?
If the database stores passwords in clear text, once a data leak occurs, all users' passwords will be directly exposed. Since most users reuse passwords on different websites, attackers can use these credentials to log into the user's email, bank and other accounts (Credential Stuffing).
Password hashing technology solves this problem: even if the database is leaked, the attacker cannot reversely deduce the original password from the hash. As long as your password is strong enough and uses the correct hash algorithm, your account security can be guaranteed.
Historical evolution of hash algorithm
First generation: simple Hash
MD5, SHA-1, SHA-256
❌ No Salt, too fast
1930s~1990s design
Second Generation: Private Password Hash
bcrypt (1999), PBKDF2 (2000)
✅ With Salt and adjustable Cost
But can still be accelerated by ASIC
Third generation: memory hard binding
scrypt (2009), Argon2 (2015)
✅ Requires a lot of memory
Best GPU/ASIC resistant
The future: quantum security
research stage
🔬 Resistant to quantum computer attacks